IIRC I believe their is no one theory that covers everything from the very small to the very big and if they ever do find one it may have big implication for everything we think we know.
Scientists have found that the mass of a sub-atomic particle is not what it should be. The measurement is the first conclusive experimental result that is at odds with one of the most important and successful theories of modern physics.
IIRC I believe their is no one theory that covers everything from the very small to the very big and if they ever do find one it may have big implication for everything we think we know.
Correct. We have no Theory of everything yet. Which I figure is also not on the near horizon yet. Gravity, for one, being a major stumble block. (how long it will take to solve that one is anyone's guess)
No doubt that finding a unifying theory (or at least a better one) would have big implication, especially compared to what we currently think we know. But it will of course be smears out over time as we slowly discover more and more ...
Just saw a (basic research) video about falling domino's ... and this kinda seems to have some similarities. (or is it sheep nr two following sheep nr one) 🙂
NASA is commissioning a study team to start early in the fall to examine unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) – that is, observations of events in the sky that cannot be identified as aircraft or known natural phenomena – from a scientific perspective. The study will focus on identifying available data, how best to collect future data, and how NASA can use that data to move the scientific understanding of UAPs forward.
...
The intention is nice. But will it result to anything interesting ... that has to be seen.
(Darn. One of James Webb Space telescope mirrors was hit by a, somewhat large, micro meteorite. Damage seems minimal.)
