Page 2 of 2

RE: SpaceX to the Moon

Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 12:34 pm
by sscadmin
@janet-evans 
Haha I know, but we are getting to the point where I may need to start taking life extension drugs to see humans land on Mars ;) Posted by: @majtom

Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System Technology Operations and Navigation Experiment (CAPSTONE) CubeSat to conduct early verification of the lunar near-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO). The CubeSat to demonstrate how to enter into and operate in NRHO as well as test a new navigation capability.
Work continues on technology development in the areas of precision landing, cryogenic fluid management & propulsion, intelligent/resilient systems and advanced robotics.

I like these thoughts here
I think China's aspirations to land humans on the moon also spurred the USA into action @robert55 ;) Nothing like good ole competition to fuel discovery and exploration.

RE: SpaceX to the Moon

Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:59 pm
by JackWhite
That's all about hype and good that they did that. SpaceX is a pop culture, so from the business and attention point of view that was a right choice by NASA

RE: SpaceX to the Moon

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2021 10:49 am
by MajTom
Posted by: @sscadmin
Haha I know, but we are getting to the point where I may need to start taking life extension drugs to see humans land on Mars

At least one should find a possibility to save your DNA in the nearest research institute.
What if the technology of sending a robot with DNA and reconstructing a human with 3D printers will be faster ready to go.

RE: SpaceX to the Moon

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:57 am
by JackWhite
Posted by: @majtom Posted by: @sscadmin
Haha I know, but we are getting to the point where I may need to start taking life extension drugs to see humans land on Mars

At least one should find a possibility to save your DNA in the nearest research institute.
What if the technology of sending a robot with DNA and reconstructing a human with 3D printers will be faster ready to go.

Robots with your DNA will not fully recreate you. There is a big part in the brain that responds to who you are. A lot of great people would not be who they were if there was different social/family/financial situation they had. The idea is cool, but if you want to recreate any person with DNA I think that would be not enough. 

RE: SpaceX to the Moon

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:28 pm
by MajTom
@jackwhite 

We don't have that knowledge and technology enough to 'recreate' from DNA.
1. ‘Recreating’ from DNA would mean either restoring all the cells. Do we know all of them, in which sequence? How the cells should be preserved during the process?
2. DNA is a permanent copy of a cell genome, changes in its structure cause great consequences.
3. There are studies that have found that DNA damage can lead to an immune response similar to that observed during viral infection.
4. Question of ethics of gene 'recreation' is open.

My post was of future considerations 'what if' and 'when'? ;)

RE: SpaceX to the ISS

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2022 1:01 pm
by Cody
First all-private flight to the ISS (via SpaceX) - eight days aboard the station. Stuff Baldy and Beardy!
No idea what they've paid, but they get eight days in orbit! BBC articlle here.

RE: SpaceX to the Moon

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2022 2:03 pm
by Pinback
55 million each for bed and breakfast and you have make your own breakfast.

RE: SpaceX to the Moon

Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2022 1:00 pm
by Cody
Posted by: @pinback
55 million each for bed and breakfast and you have make your own breakfast.

<chuckles> It'll all be mush out of a bag anyway, I expect.