SpaceSimCentral

it's ok to speculate that 9/11 was a "inside job" (even if i didn't think so), but creating and i have to say creating artificially such things doesn't help a ****. it is rather counterproductive because you can't take such serious and it will trash any else argument, even when it's pointed out right. even the windows get a scratch of it, cool no? i really wonder why the annulus (outer shelf, last layer of containment) of a NPP is made spherical and of 90cm thick concrete if this will last a airplane crash to... (no, not because of radiation, radiation is low inside the annulus, you can work without any danger close to the reactor itself, at least i have taken no disease from that. contamination and incorporating -> to swallow the dust, is the real danger).i've made also a little clip to refute the idea that a plane could never make such a damage (they say because it's made from aluminium and other light weighted material it couldn't be that a skyscraper will be destroyed). it's a simple experiment with the static properties of thin cardboard. all this has really moved me because most arguments are rubbish, but many people are blind enough to believe rather in a YT clip then anything else comprehensible. ok it's up to each one what he likes to believe (the world is flat, creationism is true because a banana fits into a human hand <img src='[url]http://spacesimcentral.com/forum/public/style_emoticons//haha.gif'[/url] class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':haha:' /> and so on... i was freakin' out on many clips actually...) the world is really coming to a end not because of a maya calendar (best comment to this, the world will end 31/12/2099, because windows calendar ends then) it's ending because of stupidity imho.

The worst simulation of a plane crashing into a building would have to be the 9/11 simulation created by the US Air Force. The simulation was created to help the military better understand the effects of a plane crashing into a building, but it was widely criticized for its inaccuracies and lack of realism. The simulation was also criticized for its lack of attention to the human cost of the tragedy.

The worst simulation of a plane crashing into a building would have to be the 9/11 simulation created by the US Air Force. The simulation was created to help the military better understand the effects of a plane crashing into a building, but it was widely criticized for its inaccuracies and lack of realism. The simulation was also criticized for its lack of attention to the human cost of the tragedy.