Page 1 of 1
The darkside of the moon isn't what we thought..
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:59 am
by shadmar
I'm sure, here's the proof after they turned it around : They also landed inside the O. :
RE: The darkside of the moon isn't what we thought..
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:03 pm
by fluffyfreak
Ah so you figured out the format, sorry I totally forgot to post the details! Nice looking moon you've got there though

RE: The darkside of the moon isn't what we thought..
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:09 pm
by shadmar
Yes I think so.. for type 0 (terran like) write binary data like this : uint16 widthuint16 heightsint16 heigtmapdata (from image) for type 1 (moonlike) write binary data like this : uint16 widthuint16 heightdouble scalemindouble scalemaxuint16 heigtmapdata (from image)
RE: The darkside of the moon isn't what we thought..
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 1:45 pm
by mikehgentry
Hehehe... The signature of the Gods... Did anyone ever read the book Contact, by Carl Sagan? In it... (spoiler follows, if you're thinking about reading it) 'aliens' left a message deep in the digits of Pi, explaining that they'd created the universe we inhabited and how to build a machine to go and visit them. I always thought that was a brilliant idea...
RE: The darkside of the moon isn't what we thought..
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 5:55 pm
by Brianetta
Did anyone ever read the book Contact, by Carl Sagan? In it...I think you need a refresher! (-:The instructions were not in pi. The instructions were in the radio signal, and the aliens mentioned the anomaly in pi after the machine had been built. They didn't know what the anomaly (an encoded circle) meant, any more than we do.Of course, since pi is a irrational number, the sequence of digits specified does appear in it somewhere. What scuppers the idea for me is that pi is half the circular constant (almost all maths is simplified by replacing pi with 2.pi), and I would be suspicious of messages from aliens suggesting that they'd made the same fundamental screw-up in basic maths that we did.
RE: The darkside of the moon isn't what we thought..
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:04 pm
by WaveMotion
Of course, since pi is a irrational number, the sequence of digits specified does appear in it somewhere. What scuppers the idea for me is that pi is half the circular constant (almost all maths is simplified by replacing pi with 2.pi), and I would be suspicious of messages from aliens suggesting that they'd made the same fundamental screw-up in basic maths that we did. Yep. We'd likely be much better off looking in tau.
RE: The darkside of the moon isn't what we thought..
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:31 pm
by NeuralKernel
So, OK... how exactly do I make a planet heightmap? I've been flying around Mars looking for something familiar for a few alphas now... forget Olympus Mons, how about a spaceport down in Valles Marineris? A couple cities scattered around the Tharsis Plateau...Forget Earth... Mars is THE place to show off a terrain engine like Pioneer

RE: The darkside of the moon isn't what we thought..
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:47 am
by mikehgentry
I think you need a refresher! (-: It was about 20 years ago...

...Of course, since pi is a irrational number, the sequence of digits specified does appear in it somewhere. What scuppers the idea for me is that pi is half the circular constant (almost all maths is simplified by replacing pi with 2.pi), and I would be suspicious of messages from aliens suggesting that they'd made the same fundamental screw-up in basic maths that we did. It appears somewhere (an infinite number of times, I suppose...), the question being whether it can be put down to chance given the number of digits examined. [url]http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2001-10-25/[/url] I seem to remember the sequence being very long and highly improbable. But I seemed to remember what I said in the previous post too!

I like the fundamental idea, even if the details were questionable. At least it wasn't in base 10, eh...?
